Petitioner
The Asiatic Petroleum Company (Philippine Islands)
Respondent
Francisco Hizon y Singian
Citation
G.R. No. 20588
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Street, J.
Decided
December 17, 1923

Summary

This case involves a surety contract dispute where Francisco Hizon y Singian guaranteed the obligations of petroleum products selling agent Justino A. David. The Supreme Court found that the principal agency contract was materially altered after the surety contract was signed by adding additional municipalities to David's territory without Hizon's knowledge or consent. Applying Civil Code principles of suretyship law, the Court held that such material alteration without the surety's consent completely releases the surety from liability. The case establishes an important precedent that sureties are discharged from their obligations when creditors and principal debtors materially modify the underlying contract without the surety's consent, reflecting fundamental principles of contract law and protection of sureties' rights under Philippine civil law.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · December 17, 1923

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.