Petitioner
G.V. Florida Transport
Respondent
Heirs of Romeo L. Battung, Jr.
Citation
G.R. No. 208802
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Perlas-Bernabe, J.
Decided
October 14, 2015

Summary

This case involves the liability of a common carrier for passenger death caused by a co-passenger. Romeo Battung, Jr. was shot and killed by another passenger while aboard G.V. Florida Transport's bus. The RTC and CA held the carrier liable for breach of contract of carriage, finding failure to implement adequate security measures. However, the Supreme Court reversed, distinguishing between different degrees of diligence required under the Civil Code. The Court applied Article 1763 rather than Articles 1755-1756, requiring only diligence of a good father of family for acts of other passengers. Since there were no suspicious circumstances requiring heightened security measures, and the killing was a surreptitious act by a co-passenger, the carrier was not negligent and therefore not liable.

Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding

Reversed and dismissed the complaint, holding a common carrier owes only the diligence of a good father of a family under Article 1763 for a co-passenger's act and was not negligent absent suspicious circumstances.

An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Cases citing this case

Cases in our corpus that cite this decision.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 14, 2015

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.