Petitioner
North Greenhills Association
Respondent
Atty. Narciso Morales
Citation
G.R. No. 222821
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Mendoza, J.
Decided
August 9, 2017

Summary

This case involves a dispute between homeowner Atty. Narciso Morales and North Greenhills Association over access rights to a subdivision park. Morales had used a side door to access McKinley Park for 33 years until NGA constructed a restroom that blocked his access. The HLURB, Office of the President, and Court of Appeals initially ruled in favor of Morales, ordering relocation of the restroom and characterizing it as a nuisance per accidens. However, the Supreme Court partially reversed, holding that NGA, as property owner, has the statutory right under Civil Code Articles 429-430 to fence its property and control access. The Court found the lower courts' nuisance determination was based on speculation rather than evidence, and that Morales had no legal easement or unbridled right to access the park through his private door. The decision reinforces property owners' rights while requiring proper evidentiary support for nuisance claims.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 9, 2017

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.