Petitioner
Torrefranca
Respondent
Fernandez
Citation
G.R. No. 253540
Court
Supreme Court
Decided
January 25, 2021

Whether an illegitimate child must use the mother's surname or can choose to use the father's surname when acknowledged by the father

Summary

This case involves a dispute over an illegitimate child's surname usage. Sandra Mae Torrefranca sought to change her daughter Theresse May's surname from the father's 'Fernandez' to her own 'Torrefranca', arguing that illegitimate children must use the mother's surname. The Supreme Court denied the petition, affirming that Article 176 of the Family Code gives acknowledged illegitimate children the discretionary choice to use either parent's surname, as evidenced by the permissive word 'may'. The Court found that proper procedures were followed when both parents jointly registered the birth using the father's surname under the applicable 2004 Administrative Order, which only required the father's acknowledgment through a public document. The decision reinforces that acknowledged illegitimate children have surname choice flexibility, while emphasizing the importance of following proper registration procedures and parental consent in birth certificate entries.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · January 25, 2021

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.