Petitioner
People
Respondent
Hon. Cesar R. Maravilla
Citation
G.R. No. L-47646
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Cruz, J.
Decided
September 19, 1988

Whether criminal case for unjust vexation has prescribed under Article 91 of the Revised Penal Code

Summary

This criminal case involves the prescription of unjust vexation charges against lawyer Manuel B. Gadon for allegedly grabbing a woman's breast. The municipal court dismissed the case, ruling it had prescribed because 83 days elapsed from the offense to filing the proper complaint. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the original complaint for acts of lasciviousness effectively interrupted prescription for unjust vexation since both crimes involve molestation and what controls is the factual description, not the legal designation. The Court calculated that prescription ran only 25 days total, well within the 60-day limit. The case was remanded for trial, establishing important precedent on criminal prescription computation and the principle that factual allegations in complaints control over legal designations.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · September 19, 1988

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.