Petitioner
Nonato
Respondent
IAC
Citation
G.R. No. L-67181
Court
Supreme Court
Decided
November 22, 1985

Whether a vendor who cancelled an installment sale by repossessing the vehicle can still demand payment of the unpaid balance of the purchase price

Summary

The Supreme Court reversed lower courts' decisions in this installment sale dispute involving spouses Nonato and Investor's Finance Corporation. The Nonatos purchased a Volkswagen on installment but defaulted on payments. IFC repossessed the vehicle in March 1978 but still demanded payment of the unpaid balance. The Court applied Article 1484 of the Civil Code, which provides three alternative remedies for vendors in installment sales: exact fulfillment, cancel the sale, or foreclose chattel mortgage. The Court found that IFC's repossession with a redemption notice constituted cancellation of the sale, barring any further collection action. The decision reinforced that these remedies are alternative, not cumulative, establishing important precedent for installment sale disputes and protecting buyers from double recovery by sellers.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · November 22, 1985

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.