Petitioner
Gotesco Properties
Respondent
Solidbank Corporation (Now Metropolitan Bank
Citation
G.R. No. 209452
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Leonen, J.
Decided
July 26, 2017

Summary

Gotesco Properties borrowed P300 million from Solidbank in 1995, secured by mortgage on multiple properties including land in Pampanga. When property values declined during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, Solidbank demanded additional collateral, which Gotesco refused to provide. After Gotesco defaulted on loan payments, Solidbank initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings and won the auction sale. Gotesco challenged the foreclosure's validity, claiming a restructuring agreement existed and procedural requirements weren't met. The Supreme Court upheld the foreclosure, ruling no restructuring agreement was perfected, Gotesco was properly in default, and all procedural requirements under Act No. 3135 were satisfied. The Court affirmed that publication in a nationally circulated newspaper like Remate was valid regardless of printing location, and the writ of possession was properly issued ministerially to the winning bidder.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · July 26, 2017

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.