- Petitioner
- Nieves Navarro
- Respondent
- Zenaida Cayabyab Harris
- Citation
- G.R. No. 228854
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- Third Division
- Ponente
- Inting, J.
- Decided
- March 17, 2021
Summary
This case involves a family dispute over the partition of Leoncia Tamondong's estate after she died intestate in 1944. In 1961, surviving family members executed an extrajudicial partition excluding the heirs of Rodrigo Cayabyab, who had predeceased the partition in 1954. Forty years later, Rodrigo's heirs filed suit to annul the partition. The Supreme Court ruled that while the extrajudicial partition was void for excluding rightful heirs in violation of succession laws requiring equal inheritance among children, a subsequent sale by one heir (Dionisia) to other family members remained valid as to her proportionate share under co-ownership principles. The Court ordered a new partition according to intestate succession laws but denied damages claims. The decision clarifies that co-owners may validly dispose of their undivided interests even when the original partition document is defective, and that determination of heirship need not require separate special proceedings when filed as part of an ordinary civil action for partition.
Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding
An extrajudicial partition that does not give the children equal shares is void (Article 980); but a co-owner's sale is valid with respect to her proportionate pro indiviso share (Article 493).
An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.