Petitioner
Wilbert Tolentino
Respondent
People
Citation
G.R. No. 240310
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Decided
August 6, 2018

Petition for certiorari challenging RTC orders denying motion to quash in cyberlibel case under RA 10175

Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed Wilbert Tolentino's petition for certiorari challenging Regional Trial Court orders that denied his motion to quash a cyberlibel information under RA 10175. The case arose from Tolentino's 2015 Facebook post, for which Eva Rose Pua filed a complaint in 2017. The SC ruled the petition was procedurally defective for failing to state the receipt date of the assailed order and for not showing grave abuse of discretion. Substantively, the SC clarified that cyberlibel under RA 10175 now carries an afflictive penalty prescribing in 15 years, making the complaint timely. The Court also affirmed that RTC Quezon City had proper jurisdiction since the complainant resided there. The constitutional requirement for clearly stated facts and law was held inapplicable to interlocutory orders like motion to quash denials.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · August 6, 2018

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.