XXX256611 v. People

Summary

XXX256611 was prosecuted for violating RA 9262 by failing to provide financial support to his children with AAA256611. The RTC convicted him under Section 5(i), while the CA modified the conviction to Section 5(e)(2). The Supreme Court acquitted him, applying the Acharon v. People precedent that established mere failure to provide financial support is insufficient for RA 9262 violation. The Court found that XXX256611's inability to provide support resulted from a serious 2012 vehicular accident that left him disabled and financially devastated, not from willful deprivation intended to control or psychologically harm the victims. The prosecution failed to prove the required intent elements under either Section 5(e)(2) (intent to control) or Section 5(i) (intent to cause psychological anguish). This case clarifies that RA 9262 requires specific criminal intent beyond mere failure to provide support.