Petitioner
Aniceto Ibabao
Respondent
People
Citation
G.R. No. L-36957
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Melencio-Herrera, J.
Decided
September 28, 1984

Whether failure to lend aid to victim justifies penalty enhancement under Article 365 of Revised Penal Code when not alleged in Information; Motion…

Summary

Petitioner Aniceto Ibabao was convicted of Homicide thru Reckless Imprudence after his jeep fatally struck a person in Davao in 1967. The key legal issue involved whether his failure to stop and render aid warranted penalty enhancement under Article 365 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by R.A. 1790. The Supreme Court established important precedent by ruling that failure to lend aid constitutes a qualifying circumstance that must be specifically alleged in the Information to justify penalty enhancement, similar to treachery in murder cases. The Court also rejected a motion for new trial based on witness recantation, emphasizing that recanted testimony is unreliable and dangerous to the judicial process. The final penalty was modified to prision correccional with increased indemnity of P30,000, balancing the criminal law requirements with procedural due process protections.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · September 28, 1984

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.